States Sue Trump Administration Over Halted Offshore Wind Project
Rhode Island and Connecticut file federal lawsuit challenging Trump administration's halt of major offshore wind project, citing economic and environmental impacts of the decision.
Offshore wind turbines under construction as part of the Revolution Wind project off Rhode Island's coast
In a significant challenge to the Trump administration's environmental policy decisions, Rhode Island and Connecticut, along with Danish energy company Orsted, have filed lawsuits over the sudden halt of a major offshore wind project that would power 350,000 homes.
Legal Battle Over Clean Energy Future
The states filed their complaint in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island, with Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha accusing the administration of conducting an "all-out assault" on wind energy. This action follows a pattern of Trump-era policies that have faced legal challenges from states and environmental advocates.
Project Status and Security Claims
The Revolution Wind project, currently 80% complete with 45 of 65 turbines installed, was paused on August 22 when the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management issued a stop work order citing unspecified national security concerns. The project represents a critical piece of New England's renewable energy infrastructure.
If drones get that close to U.S. shores to be near a wind farm without being detected by the military, "we have had a massive intelligence -- a national security -- failure," stated retired U.S. Navy Cmdr. Kirk Lippold.
Economic and Environmental Impact
The halt has significant implications for both states' economies and environmental goals. Over 1,000 workers are employed on the project, and Connecticut has invested more than $200 million in infrastructure improvements. This disruption adds to ongoing federal policy challenges affecting state-level initiatives.
Energy Security and Cost Benefits
The project would provide electricity at 9.8 cents per kilowatt-hour, locked in for 20 years - a rate significantly lower than projected New England energy costs. Connecticut officials estimate tens of millions in additional costs to ratepayers if the project fails to come online.
Rachel Whitman
Rachel L. Whitman is a political columnist and investigative journalist based in Washington, D.C. Her writing focuses on democratic resilience, civil rights, and the intersection of technology and public policy. With a background in law and public affairs, she brings sharp analysis and a deep commitment to progressive values.